Massachusetts Minutemen at Bowling Green Falcons college football matchup
- Kickoff
- Sat, Nov 28
- 12:00 PM EST
- Venue
- Bowling Green home
- Doyt L. Perry Stadium
- Captured market
- Line not posted
- No verified spread
- Player model
- 11 players
- preseason · cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1
Massachusetts visits Bowling Green in Week 13.
Massachusetts travels to Bowling Green at Doyt L. Perry Stadium. No sourced spread is attached to this game yet, so the page does not infer a favorite.
The published player model covers 11 featured skill players in this matchup. Its highest median fantasy forecasts belong to Austyn Dendy (BGSU), Hunter Najm (BGSU), and T.Y. Harding (MASS).
Market pending
There is no verified spread for this matchup in the committed snapshot.
Player projection coverage
11 player distributions are available, led by Austyn Dendy (BGSU).
Venue context
Bowling Green is the designated home team at Doyt L. Perry Stadium.
cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1 · preseason
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:31+00:00No favorite inferred
context onlyPreseason model
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:31+00:00Unit ledger
Every bar rewards the better low-number rank, while exact values stay visible for both teams.
Unit edges from the 2025 charting
Offense units paired against the defense units they will face, from snap-weighted 2025 PFF grades, national ranks, and returning-snap shares. Historical form, never a game prediction.
Each offense unit paired against the defense unit it will actually face, using 2025 snap-weighted PFF grades and national ranks, with returning-snap caveats where an edge rests on departed players. Measured history, not a game prediction.
Massachusetts pass protection vs Bowling Green pass rush
Massachusetts's pass protection graded 43.0 in 2025 (135th of 136); Bowling Green's pass rush graded 65.8 (63rd). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Bowling Green's pass rush.
Bowling Green pass protection vs Massachusetts pass rush
Bowling Green's pass protection graded 64.6 in 2025 (82nd of 136); Massachusetts's pass rush graded 65.8 (61st). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for Massachusetts's pass rush. Both units return under a quarter of their 2025 snaps, so last season's form carries less weight here.
Massachusetts receiving corps vs Bowling Green coverage
Massachusetts's receiving corps graded 56.0 in 2025 (136th of 136); Bowling Green's coverage graded 62.8 (82nd). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Bowling Green's coverage.
Bowling Green receiving corps vs Massachusetts coverage
Bowling Green's receiving corps graded 62.5 in 2025 (102nd of 136); Massachusetts's coverage graded 56.0 (134th). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for Bowling Green's receiving corps. Bowling Green's receiving corps returns only 16.0% of those snaps, so the edge rests on departed production.
Massachusetts rush offense vs Bowling Green run defense
Massachusetts's rush offense graded 65.3 in 2025 (133rd of 136); Bowling Green's run defense graded 66.8 (67th). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Bowling Green's run defense.
Bowling Green rush offense vs Massachusetts run defense
Bowling Green's rush offense graded 70.1 in 2025 (119th of 136); Massachusetts's run defense graded 62.5 (122nd). On 2025 form this pairing is effectively a push.
Where the player model concentrates
The two highest median model players for each side. Context-only prior and baseline rows are excluded.
League projected stat lines
Means and 20th–80th percentile ranges for every published model player; missing stats stay missing.
Massachusetts
6 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T.Y. Hardingbalanced · Tier 5 | WR | 7.72.4–12.2 | — | — | 2.81.0–4.1 | 3510–52 |
| Max Dowlingbalanced · Tier 6 | TE | 7.62.2–11.9 | — | — | 2.61.0–3.8 | — |
| Kezion Dia-Johnsonbalanced · Tier 5 | WR | 7.02.2–11.5 | — | — | 2.51.0–3.7 | 339–49 |
| Reece AdkinsSAFE FLOOR · Tier 6 | TE | 6.31.9–10.6 | — | — | — | 288–40 |
| Elijah PedroVOLATILE · Tier 5 | WR | 5.81.4–9.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Owen Andersonbalanced · Tier 6 | TE | 5.91.5–9.7 | — | — | — | — |
Bowling Green
5 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austyn DendyELITE · Tier 3 | RB | 15.77.1–23.8 | — | 7429–108 | — | 140–24 |
| Hunter NajmHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | QB | 9.62.1–17.9 | 14911–220 | — | — | — |
| Brennan Ridleybalanced · Tier 5 | WR | 6.21.9–10.6 | — | — | — | 299–46 |
| Leo KempWeekly model | FB | 5.71.3–9.9 | — | — | — | — |
| Blane CleaverHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | TE | 5.81.5–9.9 | — | — | — | — |
Massachusetts
- Receptions
- 2.8
- Rec yds
- 35
- Receptions
- 2.6
- Receptions
- 2.5
- Rec yds
- 33
- Rec yds
- 28
Bowling Green
- Rush yds
- 74
- Rec yds
- 14
- Pass yds
- 149
- Rec yds
- 29
The League does not publish a game-side, total, or moneyline prediction without a validated game-market model.
Generated Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT · collegefootballdata · Player outcomes are ranges, not guarantees. No game-side, total, or moneyline prediction is inferred.
Props to compare after a line posts
Model ranges are not recommendations. No player-prop line or price is captured in this artifact.
| Player | Market | Projection | Median | 20th–80th | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austyn DendyRB · BGSU | Rushing yards | 74.3 | 62.8 | 29.4–107.5 | Shop the line |
| Hunter NajmQB · BGSU | Passing yards | 149.3 | 171.0 | 11.3–219.8 | Shop the line |
| T.Y. HardingWR · MASS | Receiving yards | 34.9 | 26.3 | 9.8–52.1 | Shop the line |
| Max DowlingTE · MASS | Receptions | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.0–3.8 | Shop the line |
| Kezion Dia-JohnsonWR · MASS | Receiving yards | 33.2 | 23.4 | 9.4–49.4 | Shop the line |
| Reece AdkinsTE · MASS | Receiving yards | 28.4 | 20.9 | 7.7–40.3 | Shop the line |
Rushing yards
- Projection
- 74.3
- Median
- 62.8
- 20th–80th
- 29.4–107.5
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Passing yards
- Projection
- 149.3
- Median
- 171.0
- 20th–80th
- 11.3–219.8
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 34.9
- Median
- 26.3
- 20th–80th
- 9.8–52.1
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receptions
- Projection
- 2.6
- Median
- 2.1
- 20th–80th
- 1.0–3.8
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 33.2
- Median
- 23.4
- 20th–80th
- 9.4–49.4
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 28.4
- Median
- 20.9
- 20th–80th
- 7.7–40.3
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Methodology and data boundary
Schedule and venue facts come from the committed ESPN 2026 catalog. Spreads are dated market snapshots, prioritizing DraftKings where available. Player stat lines and fantasy ranges come only from the versioned weekly CFB quantile model; prior and baseline context do not enter this page. Missing data stays missing.
- Line snapshot
- No line
- Model update
- Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT
- Game prediction
- Not validated