Texas A&M Aggies at LSU Tigers college football matchup
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 26
- Time TBA
- Venue
- LSU home
- Tiger Stadium (LA)
- Captured market
- Line not posted
- No verified spread
- Player model
- 21 players
- preseason · cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1
Texas A&M visits LSU in Week 4.
Texas A&M travels to LSU at Tiger Stadium (LA). No sourced spread is attached to this game yet, so the page does not infer a favorite.
The published player model covers 21 featured skill players in this matchup. Its highest median fantasy forecasts belong to Marcel Reed (TA&M), Sam Leavitt (LSU), and Jackson Harris (LSU).
Market pending
There is no verified spread for this matchup in the committed snapshot.
Player projection coverage
21 player distributions are available, led by Marcel Reed (TA&M).
Venue context
LSU is the designated home team at Tiger Stadium (LA).
cfb-fantasy-quantile-2026.1 · preseason
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:02+00:00No favorite inferred
context onlyPreseason model
As of 2026-08-13T21:35:02+00:00Unit ledger
Every bar rewards the better low-number rank, while exact values stay visible for both teams.
Unit edges from the 2025 charting
Offense units paired against the defense units they will face, from snap-weighted 2025 PFF grades, national ranks, and returning-snap shares. Historical form, never a game prediction.
Each offense unit paired against the defense unit it will actually face, using 2025 snap-weighted PFF grades and national ranks, with returning-snap caveats where an edge rests on departed players. Measured history, not a game prediction.
Texas A&M pass protection vs LSU pass rush
Texas A&M's pass protection graded 71.1 in 2025 (27th of 136); LSU's pass rush graded 64.7 (75th). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Texas A&M's pass protection.
LSU pass protection vs Texas A&M pass rush
LSU's pass protection graded 65.8 in 2025 (71st of 136); Texas A&M's pass rush graded 69.4 (21st). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Texas A&M's pass rush.
Texas A&M receiving corps vs LSU coverage
Texas A&M's receiving corps graded 65.8 in 2025 (50th of 136); LSU's coverage graded 67.4 (33rd). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for LSU's coverage.
LSU receiving corps vs Texas A&M coverage
LSU's receiving corps graded 63.0 in 2025 (92nd of 136); Texas A&M's coverage graded 70.5 (17th). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Texas A&M's coverage.
Texas A&M rush offense vs LSU run defense
Texas A&M's rush offense graded 75.4 in 2025 (68th of 136); LSU's run defense graded 70.2 (36th). On 2025 form that is a modest edge for LSU's run defense.
LSU rush offense vs Texas A&M run defense
LSU's rush offense graded 70.5 in 2025 (114th of 136); Texas A&M's run defense graded 66.6 (73rd). On 2025 form that is a clear edge for Texas A&M's run defense.
Where the player model concentrates
The two highest median model players for each side. Context-only prior and baseline rows are excluded.
League projected stat lines
Means and 20th–80th percentile ranges for every published model player; missing stats stay missing.
Texas A&M
7 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcel Reedbalanced · Tier 4 | QB | 20.08.6–28.8 | 206134–258 | 397–64 | — | — |
| Rueben Owens IISAFE FLOOR · Tier 5 | RB | 12.24.1–20.6 | — | 5515–79 | 2.00.0–3.4 | — |
| Ashton Bethel-Romanbalanced · Tier 6 | WR | 9.73.1–15.4 | — | — | 2.91.0–4.3 | 4413–66 |
| Mario Craverbalanced · Tier 6 | WR | 9.83.1–16.1 | — | — | 3.61.1–5.7 | 4313–64 |
| Isaiah HortonVOLATILE · Tier 6 | WR | 9.73.2–14.8 | — | — | 3.01.0–4.3 | 3911–56 |
| Houston ThomasVOLATILE · Tier 6 | TE | 8.92.9–14.7 | — | — | 3.31.0–5.0 | 3811–54 |
| Richie AndersonELITE · Tier 6 | TE | 8.92.5–14.0 | — | — | 3.51.0–5.3 | 3713–55 |
LSU
14 League projections| Player | Pos | Fantasy pts | Pass yds | Rush yds | Receptions | Rec yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Leavittbalanced · Tier 4 | QB | 17.87.4–27.1 | 212146–268 | 27-0–47 | — | — |
| Jackson HarrisELITE · Tier 6 | WR | 15.85.5–21.7 | — | — | 4.01.0–6.1 | 6323–89 |
| Jayce BrownELITE · Tier 6 | WR | 13.64.5–21.5 | — | — | 3.71.1–5.8 | 5818–83 |
| Eugene Wilson IIIbalanced · Tier 6 | WR | 10.44.7–18.6 | — | — | 4.31.1–6.2 | 5017–82 |
| Trey'Dez GreenHIGH CEILING · Tier 6 | TE | 8.83.1–15.2 | — | — | 3.21.0–5.0 | 4213–62 |
| Harlem BerryELITE · Tier 6 | RB | 10.03.2–16.0 | — | 5315–79 | 1.70.0–3.1 | — |
| Tre' BrownELITE · Tier 6 | WR | 9.13.1–14.2 | — | — | 3.31.0–5.4 | 4815–68 |
| Caden Durhambalanced · Tier 6 | RB | 8.12.3–12.5 | — | 418–60 | — | — |
| Winston Watkins Jr.VOLATILE · Tier 6 | WR | 8.32.4–13.5 | — | — | 2.81.0–4.4 | 3612–57 |
| Dilin Jonesbalanced · Tier 6 | RB | 8.02.3–12.1 | — | 409–65 | — | — |
| Rod Gainey Jr.SAFE FLOOR · Tier 6 | RB | 7.01.8–11.5 | — | — | 1.70.0–3.0 | — |
| Roman MothershedELITE · Tier 6 | WR | 7.52.2–12.0 | — | — | 2.91.0–4.3 | 3810–55 |
| Malachi ThomasELITE · Tier 6 | TE | 6.31.7–10.3 | — | — | — | — |
| Malik ElzySAFE FLOOR · Tier 6 | WR | 6.11.9–10.2 | — | — | — | 277–37 |
Texas A&M
- Pass yds
- 206
- Rush yds
- 39
- Rush yds
- 55
- Receptions
- 2.0
- Receptions
- 2.9
- Rec yds
- 44
- Receptions
- 3.6
- Rec yds
- 43
- Receptions
- 3.0
- Rec yds
- 39
- Receptions
- 3.3
- Rec yds
- 38
- Receptions
- 3.5
- Rec yds
- 37
LSU
- Pass yds
- 212
- Rush yds
- 27
- Receptions
- 4.0
- Rec yds
- 63
- Receptions
- 3.7
- Rec yds
- 58
- Receptions
- 4.3
- Rec yds
- 50
- Receptions
- 3.2
- Rec yds
- 42
- Rush yds
- 53
- Receptions
- 1.7
- Receptions
- 3.3
- Rec yds
- 48
- Rush yds
- 41
- Receptions
- 2.8
- Rec yds
- 36
- Rush yds
- 40
- Receptions
- 1.7
- Receptions
- 2.9
- Rec yds
- 38
- Rec yds
- 27
The League does not publish a game-side, total, or moneyline prediction without a validated game-market model.
Generated Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT · collegefootballdata · Player outcomes are ranges, not guarantees. No game-side, total, or moneyline prediction is inferred.
Props to compare after a line posts
Model ranges are not recommendations. No player-prop line or price is captured in this artifact.
| Player | Market | Projection | Median | 20th–80th | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcel ReedQB · TA&M | Passing yards | 205.7 | 207.2 | 133.5–257.9 | Shop the line |
| Sam LeavittQB · LSU | Passing yards | 211.8 | 211.0 | 145.7–268.4 | Shop the line |
| Jackson HarrisWR · LSU | Receiving yards | 63.4 | 46.5 | 23.0–88.8 | Shop the line |
| Jayce BrownWR · LSU | Receiving yards | 58.1 | 43.2 | 17.8–82.8 | Shop the line |
| Rueben Owens IIRB · TA&M | Rushing yards | 55.1 | 46.7 | 14.8–79.0 | Shop the line |
| Eugene Wilson IIIWR · LSU | Receiving yards | 50.1 | 41.0 | 17.3–81.9 | Shop the line |
Passing yards
- Projection
- 205.7
- Median
- 207.2
- 20th–80th
- 133.5–257.9
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Passing yards
- Projection
- 211.8
- Median
- 211.0
- 20th–80th
- 145.7–268.4
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 63.4
- Median
- 46.5
- 20th–80th
- 23.0–88.8
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 58.1
- Median
- 43.2
- 20th–80th
- 17.8–82.8
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Rushing yards
- Projection
- 55.1
- Median
- 46.7
- 20th–80th
- 14.8–79.0
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Receiving yards
- Projection
- 50.1
- Median
- 41.0
- 20th–80th
- 17.3–81.9
- Status
- Shop the line
No captured player-prop line. Compare the model range only after a market posts.
Methodology and data boundary
Schedule and venue facts come from the committed ESPN 2026 catalog. Spreads are dated market snapshots, prioritizing DraftKings where available. Player stat lines and fantasy ranges come only from the versioned weekly CFB quantile model; prior and baseline context do not enter this page. Missing data stays missing.
- Line snapshot
- No line
- Model update
- Aug 13, 5:35 PM EDT
- Game prediction
- Not validated